Fluid Scanning Technology
"I have converted entirely to the ScanScience way and
abandoned my makeshift oil methods.
I never make dry film scans anymore, it throws away too
much quality....Everyone out there who is serious about
getting the best possible scans needs to be doing wet
scanning and ScanScience makes it affordable on almost
any scanner. "
CTEIN, PHOTO TECHNIQUES, NOV / DEC 2009
- See also PHOTO TECHNIQUES Nov/Dec 2007
- PROFESSIONAL PHOTO MAGAZINE
Key to the ScanScience Fluid Scanning
Magic: In Optical Microscopy, thanks to
Fluid Immersion, resolution and
magnification are both increased to the limit.
Fluid Immersion does the same in scanning
for the same reason and has always been
the procedure used with drum scanners
costing up to $100K.
Fluid Scanning benefits to photography go
beyond resolution: The extended dynamic
range, increased contrast and color
saturation makes images come alive.
The thousands spent on your finest lenses
are only as good as the scan. The finest
quality scans are fluid scans.
ScanScience brings these same cutting edge
techniques to all scanners.
- This highly acclaimed eBook Total Scanning is a
comprehensive treatise on scanning aimed at the
intermediate to advanced user, the photography artist
and teacher. It covers the cutting-edge techniques of
fluid scanning and provides guidelines on optimizing
scans for printing.
- The "Smart Scan" tables computes scan resolution
needed at a viewing distance according to print size.
You no longer have to scan at 300 ppi for all print sizes
then scale the image down in Photoshop: Scan for the
print and get full fluid-scan-quality un-degraded by
image resizing. How large a quality print can I make
from my scan? What file size do I need for a scan?
Should I scan in 16 or 8 bit? Total Scanning provides
- This new electronic book has great advantage over
print books as it is alive with numerous internal and
external hot-links to help you navigate, explore and
research many topics further. It is a valuable teaching
aid and reference, and it is richly illustrated
- This book is included with Pro Kits for Film Scanners
and can be purchased for $15.00 with any kit, or
purchased without kits for $25.00.
|You are viewing the dry scanned image.
Run the mouse over the image to see the true
saturated colors on film wet-scanned with
Copyright ScanScience / JAF 2012
USER'S REVIEW of ScanScience
Raw Scans, untagged with any color space can go directly to Photoshop to be tagged with a non-clipping,
non distorting color space like the relatively new Adobe Wide Gamut RGB. With digital cameras choosing
RAW should allow you to select a color space, but not always: you may find that a clipping color space like
Adobe RGB or worse, sRGB were tagged to the image file, shortchanging the palette of modern printers
like Canon's IPG 5000, and 6300, and Epson 4800.
could print the reds, greens and blues that are printable today. These vintage color spaces suited vintage
printers, not todays modern printers and inks: After all your printer is limited to the colors in the selected
color space. Color is a very critical issue for gallery prints and Art Photographers: You have opted for
below is a must read.
SCANSCIENCE FLUID-SCANNING TOOLS ENABLE THE PUREST EXPRESSION OF THE MEDIUM
|COLOR: FILM VS THE DIGITAL CAMERA - Excerpts from the forthcoming eBook Total Scanning 2
|All graphs Images & Graphs in this page produced by
ScanScience with Chromix Software. Copyright
range: Only colors within by the color space are available
to the printer. Today's modern printers and inks reach
further afield into reds, greens blues which were
unprintable years thus require color spaces that will make
those colors available. Because vintage color spaces like
sRGB and later Adobe RGB, (which many photographers
still use) were developed for vintage printers and monitors,
those color spaces of yesterday are inadequate today. If
you value color, it is time for a change in color space or
printer or both.
The representation of color is a 3 dimensional affair which
plots the chromaticity coordinates in the horizontal axis'
and luminance in the vertical axis. (2D graphs are a
simplification). This is shown in 3D Figures 1 and 1a, 2 and
2b, (on the right), where the base is the gamut of visible
colors, the CIE, shown here for comparison. The wire
frame in the 3D graphs represents color working spaces,
i.e. Adobe RGB and Adobe Wide Gamut RGB (AWG). The
solid color figure within the wire frame is the 3D profile of
Canon's Image Prograph 5000 set out against the color
space in the wire frame, and the CIE gamut in 2D as the
base. Evidently both color spaces are smaller in places
than the printer profiles. The wire frames are smaller than
the printer profiles which bulge -out. Where that happens,
those colors outside the color space will be unprintable,
and not fed to the printer, even though the printer is
capable of printing them. The printers call for a larger color
|Film, like the eye sees logarithmically. Digital their
capacity, it spills over neighboring sensors.
Film-generated images have as result a
naturalness that is driving photographic artists
back to film. Large-format film can produce
ultra-fine detail, beyond a digital camera's
capacity. Know of a 220 MP digital back for 4 x 5?
That is how many MP would be required to match
digitally the content of 4 x 5 film.
Color also may be another reason for using film.
With film scans you are free to choose the color
space which is probably the most important
decision you will make.
This is also shown In 2D figures 3a, which shows
the ICC range of colors visible to the eye, against
the Adobe RGB color space, (triangle) and the
gamut of colors printable by two printers. In this
figure we see that the Adobe RGB color space is
smaller than the colors printable by the Epson
4800 and Canon IPG 6300.
In figure 3b, where the color space is AWG,
clipping is avoided. At the present time, no printer
is yet capable of printing the full range of visible
the ICC range of visible colors). Advances in inks
and printers have expanded the range of
printable colors. Reaching further to print all
visible colors is no doubt the holy grail of printer
Larger color spaces than Adobe RGB and sRGB, were already available before the introduction of Adobe
Wide Gamut color space but they had big problems: These color spaces bulged with false colors that
caused severe color shifts and distortions.
Kodak, introduced the first big-color space when, tired of the inadequate tiny the color spaces available at the
time, introduced ProPhoto RGB, which was much larger than then available color spaces. From the extreme
of a color space, that was too small to render an image with fidelity it went to the extreme of rendering an
image with lack of fidelity because that color space bulged with false colors in the blue areas. The false colors
existed only in numbers but are not visible to the eye. This is shown in Fig 4. Imaginary colors in a color
space have the effect that the image's pixels are spread into the bulge of false and imaginary colors
destroying the natural color balance. The result is major compensations and color correction in editing.
Adobe Wide Gamut RGB solved this problem, it adds no false colors and it only contains real, visible colors.
Adobe Wide Gamut is the preferred the color space for now and the future.
Printers still fall slightly short of filling Adobe Wide Gamut, and do not yet have profiles to match it, requiring
color adjustments, -though fewer, but not clipping any colors in film. Presently, Don RGB, another named
color space, comes closer to match available printers. As this is written, digital camera manufacturers such
as Canon now use AWG instead of ProPhoto RGB in their latest version of their application, Digital Photo
Professional (DPP). With Wide Gamut RGB, Adobe has successfully created a modern color space tailored
to modern times.
Film users are free to choose a color space for their scans but digital users can't always do that and many
find that their RAW files are tied to clipping spaces like adobe RGB. (sRGB, short for skinny RGB or other
unprintable words that begin in s), does not deserve mention in the realm of art printing.
|NEW! Focusing Target #9.17
Essential for all scanners, a must for flatbed scanners.
Order yours now
We recently had an opportunity to scan an ideal image made with a 5 x 7 camera and B&W film, by well
Known photographer Craig Alan Huber from "In Platino Veritas Images" in Washington State. This image
gave us the opportunity to show the differences between fluid scanning and dry scanning which are shown
here. Thanks to Mr Huber for generously giving his permission use his image and post the results.
At ScanScience we scanned the negative on an Epson V750 using Silverfast 6i at 3600 ppi resolution, on a
16 bit gray scale, using ScanScience tools and Lumina Scanning fluid. The result was an enormous 750 MB
plus file, which gave enabled us to crop various sections at high resolution and magnification. This very high
resolution scan for such a large negative was chosen as it delivered the best looking image at high
magnification. We also tried a scan at 6400 ppi, found no improvements, only bloated files that took longer to
scan, so we did not use it.
The optimum focus of V scanners is known to vary so we first determined the optimum elevation for our unit
by scanning the new ScanScience target. It turned out to be 2.6 mm, so all scans including the dry scans
were run at 2.6 mm. (The negative was very flat so the un-sharpness of the dry scan was due solely to the
inadequacies of dry scanning, which throws away much of the quality.)
We show below two small crops of the image from the center and corner at 200 % magnification. Both
images are raw, with no manipulations whatsoever by the scanner software or Photoshop.
|You can see many more wet/dry scan samples by clicking the ScanSamples tab in the main
Image 1, is a small section at center,
and you can see that hole in the mesh
of the source image.
The wet scan at left of image 1, easily
blows away the dry scan on the right by
a large factor, -helped by the fact that at
center the lens is sharper. You would
not know the image was that sharp from
the dry scan. The detail in the mesh and
it contrast are phenomenal in the wet
Image 2 is a small crop from the left
corner of the source image. The wet
scanned image is still sharper than the
dry, but the difference between them is
not as great because camera lenses are
less sharp at the corners. Notice also
that the blacks are blacker and contrast
is greater in the wet scan.
IMPORTANT: You can not use Epson
Scan to access the high resolution
optics in the V750 or V700. You must
use Silverfast or Vuescan.
Image from Source 5x7 Negative
Scancience Kit Fluid-Scan
|COLOR SATURATION AND SCANSCIENCE
|This Just In From Australia:
" I have been happily scanning and am very impressed with the Scan Science product. I posted
about it on my blog here:" Michael Hood's Blog
Extracts from Michael's Hood Blog:
" The cost of all the materials is pretty reasonable and very much worth the investment. Why pay
for expensive camera lenses when a lot of detail is lost in the scanning stage? The Scan Science
Lumina fluid is great and I appreciate the work that has gone in to making it perform well and
(very importantly) be safe to use. I imagine it would not be very much fun to work with something
that is more toxic and less tolerant. I urge anyone thinking about this using this method to not
hold back and stop wasting time with lesser scans, fluid mounting is well worth it."
- The images below show what can be produced using the ScanScience kit for the Epson V750, using the whole of two minutes spent on preparing the
- These images are raw scans without sharpening or any other artefacts.
- Notice the improvement in resolution, contrast and dynamic range The color images in the Samples page are equally stunning!
| SITE INDEX|
- This Page shows a sample scan of Fluid-vs. Dry-Scanning, new announcements about
our products and key info of interest to photogs.
- The Scanner Kits page shows kits for your scanners. If you don´t find your scanner here
send us a short email.
- The LUMINA fluid page describes the technical advantages that make Lumina the best
scanner fluid available: Not least the health reasons.
- The Technical page gives you a broad introduction to
- The Samples page shows comparisons of Fluid Vs. Dry-scanned images from various
- The Gallery page displays images by well known photographers scanned with our
- Click on the About-US pageto find out who we are.
- Click on the Contact-US to place your order or to discuss your projects and needs. We
will send you a paypal invoice according to your directions. With PayPal you can use your
- The BUYNOW Page has a link to the Price List and Catalog, and info on shipping to
Professional Photo Artists,
Institutions and universities the
world over use our products to
produce high quality images for
galleries and archives.
We are into our tenth year of
operations. Our business has
expanded thanks to word of
mouth from satisfied
We are proud to introduce well known photographer
Charles Cramer magnificent landscapes published
in the May 2013 issue of Outdoor Photographer
Magazine and grace our Gallery page:
"I have switched from Kami mounting fluid to
Lumina. It works just as well, is safer, and the
odor doesn't cause headaches".
"I've done about 160 scans this summer of my
4x5s, and have found some nice images hiding in
my archives. It's been great to use Lumina!"
Note: Mr. Cramer uses a Tango drum scanner.
Visit our new Gallery page to see some of his
|NEW KITS FOR THE EPSON V 850 / V8000 IN THE SCANNER KITS PAGE